Replying to Nepal’s Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s statement on Lord Rama, The Babri Party, Iqbal Ansari said that ram’s servant Hanuman ji was angry and nepal would not even know where it went.
Ayodhya: Iqbal Ansari, who is a party to the Babri Masjid, responded by nepal’s Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli (KP Oli Oli) to his controversial statement on Lord Rama, saying that if Ram’s servant Hanuman got angry, Nepal would not even know where it went. Iqbal Ansari responded to Nepal’s Prime Minister Oli, who did not tell Ayodhya the birthplace of Lord Sriram, saying that 0 “Ayodhya is respected by people all over the world, who are coming from ancient civilization, not from today. Ayodhya is the city of dharma and the deities of all religions and castes are enthroned here.0 ”
He said the importance of Ayodhya is not known to the Prime Minister of Nepal. Hanuman Ji is also enthroned with Lord Rama in Ayodhya. If Hanuman ji is angry now, Nepal will not even know where he went.
Ansari said Prime Minister Oli is not aware of his religion. Anti-Hindu work is done in Nepal. The Prime Minister of Nepal does not know about Ayodhya, nor has he ever travelled to Ayodhya. If he had ever come to Ayodhya, he would have known that there was the voice of the gods. The consequences of calling Lord Sriram and Ayodhya wrong will be very bad.0 ”
Nepal’s Prime Minister Oli is making a statement against India these days. Prime Minister Oli had made a statement that India had built a fake Ayodhya for cultural encroachment, while the real Ayodhya is in Nepal. Oli questioned how Ram came to Janakpur when there were no modern transport modes and communications at that time. His statement is witnessing a sharp response from religious leaders in India.
Oli cleans up after all round eroding
There was all-round criticism of Nepal’s Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s remarks on Lord Rama and Ayodhya. Meanwhile, the Nepalese government on Tuesday offered a clean-up in defence of the Prime Minister’s statement and said Prime Minister Oli’s statements were “not related to any political subject” and that he did not intend to “hurt” anyone’s feelings in any way.
